Despite billions for discoveries, pipeline of drugs is far from full
Andrew Pollack,
The New York Times, pC1, April 19, 2002

"The
industry's output of new drugs has risen only modestly in the last two
decades despite a more than sixfold increase [...] in R&D spending,
to more than $30 billion annually. In the last few years, the output
has actually declined."

"The perceived paucity of new drugs in company pipelines has become a preoccupation of the industry and of Wall Street."

"No one has yet found a reliable way to fill the pipeline."

"Over
the last 25 years, a parade of technologies has promised to transform
drug development: genetic engineering, rational drug design,
combinatorial chemistry, improved screening -- and now, genomics. Yet
the time spent to develop a drug, not counting the months consumed by
government review, has lengthened to more than 11 years from about 9
years in the 1980's [...], and the cost has more than doubled."

"The
industry's failure rate, a big part of its costs, has not
declined. The odds are just dreadful, and they seem to be getting
worse'' [said] Julie A. Olson, a VP for licensing at Pfizer."
Unblocking the pipeline
Alison Motluk,
New Scientist, v187 i2511 p53(5), August 6, 2005

"Drug discovery: the pharmaceutical industry needs a shot in the arm. Where will that innovation come from?"